How to type faster

Typing speed is one of the few office skills where deliberate practice pays off in weeks rather than years โ€” and where most advice is folklore. Here is what the evidence and the touch-typing tradition actually support.

Know your baseline

Take a one-minute test before changing anything โ€” the typing speed test scores words per minute and accuracy together, which matters because the two trade off. For reference: casual typists average 35โ€“40 WPM, office workers 40โ€“50, professional typists 65โ€“80, and competitive typists live above 120. A "word" is standardised at five characters, so scores are comparable across tests and texts.

Retest weekly, same time of day. Speed fluctuates with tiredness โ€” comparing a Monday morning to a Friday night tells you about your week, not your progress.

Why hunt-and-peck has a ceiling

Looking at the keyboard caps you near 30 WPM no matter how long you practise, because the eyes become the bottleneck: they ping between screen and keys, and every glance costs the reading flow that fast typing rides on. Touch typing โ€” each finger owning its keys, eyes never leaving the screen โ€” removes that bottleneck entirely, which is why it has no comparable ceiling.

The standard is home row: fingers rest on ASDF and JKL;, the bumps on F and J anchoring the hands blind. Every key belongs to one finger, and the discipline of using the correct finger โ€” even when it feels slower โ€” is the entire method. Sight-typists who "know roughly where keys are" plateau; touch typists do not.

Accuracy first is not a platitude

The counterintuitive rule every typing teacher repeats because it is measurably true: typing 10 WPM slower at 99% accuracy beats typing faster at 95%. Errors cost more than their correction time โ€” each one breaks rhythm, forces a backspace pause, and worst of all rehearses the wrong finger movement. Practising fast and sloppy trains sloppiness with excellent muscle memory.

The test reflects this honestly: only correctly typed characters count toward speed. If your accuracy sits below 96%, slow down until it doesn't; speed returns within days and then keeps climbing.

A four-week plan

  • Week 1 โ€” remap. Learn home row and correct fingering. Expect to be slower than your old style; this is the investment week. Ten to fifteen minutes daily beats an hour on Saturday, every time.
  • Week 2 โ€” stop looking. Cover your hands with a tea towel if needed. Speed recovers to your old baseline surprisingly fast.
  • Week 3 โ€” common words. The top few hundred English words are most of what you ever type; drilling them turns whole words into single finger-gestures. The test draws from exactly this vocabulary.
  • Week 4 โ€” real work. Write emails and documents with the new fingering, no regressions allowed. From here, ordinary work is the practice.

Most people land 10โ€“20 WPM above their old baseline within the month, with the curve still rising.

Breaking plateaus

Every typist stalls somewhere. The escapes that work: type slightly above comfortable speed on easy text (errors will spike, then fall โ€” this stretches the ceiling), drill your personal problem letters (the test's word-by-word tally shows where errors cluster), and practise numbers and punctuation, which most people never train and which drag real-world speed far below test speed.

Check the hardware too: a keyboard with dead or chattering keys quietly fights you โ€” the keyboard tester rules that out in a minute โ€” and gamers wanting the same measurement for clicks have the CPS test and reaction test nearby.

Hands, keyboards and comfort

Speed lives downstream of comfort. Wrists floating or on a rest โ€” not bent upward; elbows at roughly ninety degrees; screen high enough that you are not craning. Discomfort that persists is a signal to fix the setup, not to push through: RSI ends typing careers, and prevention is embarrassingly cheap.

Keyboards matter less than forums insist, but travel and feedback are real: most people type fastest on boards with clear actuation feedback, whether mechanical or good laptop scissor switches. What matters far more is that it is the same keyboard โ€” muscle memory is device-specific, and alternating between a desktop board and a cramped laptop costs speed on both.

The endpoint worth aiming at: typing at the speed of composing thought, roughly 60โ€“70 WPM, where the keyboard disappears entirely. Past that, gains are for leaderboards. Pikkit has the whole test bench, and the words-per-page guide covers what all those words add up to.

Sources and further reading

The claims in this guide rest on these references, which were checked when the guide was last updated. Spotted an error? The contact page says how to report it.

  1. Touch typing โ€” Wikipedia
  2. Words per minute โ€” Wikipedia

Try the tool

Frequently asked questions

What is a good typing speed?

40 WPM is a working speed, 60-70 means the keyboard no longer slows your thinking, and 80+ is professional-typist territory. The average person types around 40.

How long does it take to learn touch typing?

About four weeks of 10-15 daily minutes to beat your old speed, with gains continuing for months after. The first week feels slower โ€” that is the investment.

Should I practise speed or accuracy?

Accuracy. Below about 96%, slow down: errors rehearse wrong movements and cost more time than they save. Speed built on accuracy keeps climbing; the reverse stalls.

Why is my real-world typing slower than my test score?

Tests use common words; real work adds numbers, punctuation and symbols most people never drilled. Practising those closes the gap.

Do mechanical keyboards make you type faster?

Marginally at best โ€” clear feedback helps some people. Using one consistent keyboard matters far more, since muscle memory is device-specific.